All times are UTC + 2 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: ASTM material
PostPosted: Fri Jan 27, 2012 7:54 am 
Offline
----------------
----------------
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2011 1:35 pm
Posts: 10
Location: Ahmedabad
Thanks akonrad.
Meanwhile, I got suggestions from AIA to recertify ASTM A270 as SA 213 or SA 249.
As you have mensioned,
Quote:
...it can still be used on basis of UG-10, after proper recertification. To be able to recertify, you physically need both specs to review them for differencies. This things should be done before the material is bought...
I have already compared the respective grades that will be used. Their chemical, physical and other properties remain almost same. Any minor differences here can be indicated in material purchase specification. But I am still working on other differences that should be reported.
The point that I still like to know is if all the requirement of UG-10 (2) (a), (b), (c) & (d) are satisfied then what are the marking requirement of UG-10 (2) (e).
Code:
(e) The material has marking, acceptable to the Inspector, for identification to the documentation.

Also, UG-10 (2) (f) says that ,
Code:
(f) When the conformance of the material with the permitted specification has been established, the material has been marked as required by the permitted specification.
Does this mean that the aquired material should be marked by vessel manufacturer as per SA 213/249?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: ASTM material
PostPosted: Fri Jan 27, 2012 8:06 pm 
Offline
----------------
----------------
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2001 1:00 am
Posts: 656
akonrad wrote:
Quote:
Material for which allowable stress is not in Sect. II/D cannot be used


Yes, it can. It's all about what "used" means, what "cannot" and so on. But believe me, I have used materials and you wouldn't find them in SecIID.


For pressure retaining parts, we mean. External attachments shall be of "weldable quality"
If you mean for pressure retaining, I would be curious to know which S (allowable stress) you entered in your calculations.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: ASTM material
PostPosted: Sun Jan 29, 2012 12:31 am 
Offline
----------------
----------------
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 11:11 am
Posts: 480
Location: England
Mauro, it depends. There are several different situations when one uses material which is not listed in Table 1A. The most obvious is a Code Case with its own table for S values, but that's not all. You can imagine a situation when you apply for a new material added into the SecII, SecVIII-1 (relevant table Uxx-23), SecIX and so on. After the case goes through balloting and it gets approved, you get a letter. You can use it from now on, even before publishing a new Code edition/addenda with this material officially listed. Another situation is using UG-15. Enough for today :)
Konrad

_________________
Konrad Anikiel


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: ASTM material
PostPosted: Sun Jan 29, 2012 12:34 am 
Offline
----------------
----------------
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 11:11 am
Posts: 480
Location: England
Shrinath, as I am currently on holliday, I can't answer your question with enough assurance that it would be correct. I will come back to office in a week, I will look into my papers.

_________________
Konrad Anikiel


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: ASTM material
PostPosted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 11:05 pm 
Offline
----------------
----------------
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2001 1:00 am
Posts: 656
akonrad wrote:
Mauro, it depends. There are several different situations when one uses material which is not listed in Table 1A. The most obvious is a Code Case with its own table for S values, but that's not all. You can imagine a situation when you apply for a new material added into the SecII, SecVIII-1 (relevant table Uxx-23), SecIX and so on. After the case goes through balloting and it gets approved, you get a letter. You can use it from now on, even before publishing a new Code edition/addenda with this material officially listed. Another situation is using UG-15. Enough for today :)
Konrad


You are right Konrad, actually i didn't think about this possibility but when I wrote:
I would be curious to know which S (allowable stress) you entered in your calculations.

I asked for an answer which might be, e.g.: from CC
Mauro


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: ASTM material
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2012 1:35 am 
Offline
----------------
----------------
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 11:11 am
Posts: 480
Location: England
Quote:
I asked for an answer which might be, e.g.: from CC

You can't always get what you want...

_________________
Konrad Anikiel


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: ASTM material
PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2012 6:25 am 
Offline
----------------
----------------
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2011 1:35 pm
Posts: 10
Location: Ahmedabad
akonrad wrote:
Shrinath, as I am currently on holliday, I can't answer your question with enough assurance that it would be correct. I will come back to office in a week, I will look into my papers.

Thanks, akonrad.
I will be waiting for your answer. I surely need some help to figure out these two (UG-10 (2) (e) & (f)).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: ASTM material
PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2012 11:45 am 
Offline
----------------
----------------

Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 7:57 am
Posts: 78
UG-10 covers Material identified with or produced to a specification not permitted by this Division & material not fully identified.
UG 10 (a) Identified Material With Complete Certification from the Material Manufacturer.
Code:
UG 10 (a)(2)(e) The material has marking, acceptable to the Inspector, for identification to the documentation.

This means Inspector correlates the existing marking with the T.C
Code:
UG 10 (a)(2)(f) When the conformance of the material with the
permitted specification has been established, the material
has been marked as required by the permitted specification.

The material is marked with the new marking in presense of Inspector .


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC + 2 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

phpBB SEO