Thanks akonrad.
Meanwhile, I got suggestions from AIA to recertify ASTM A270 as SA 213 or SA 249.
As you have mensioned,
Quote:
...it can still be used on basis of UG-10, after proper recertification. To be able to recertify, you physically need both specs to review them for differencies. This things should be done before the material is bought...
I have already compared the respective grades that will be used. Their chemical, physical and other properties remain almost same. Any minor differences here can be indicated in material purchase specification. But I am still working on other differences that should be reported.
The point that I still like to know is if all the requirement of UG-10 (2) (a), (b), (c) & (d) are satisfied then what are the marking requirement of UG-10 (2) (e).
Code:
(e) The material has marking, acceptable to the Inspector, for identification to the documentation.
Also, UG-10 (2) (f) says that ,
Code:
(f) When the conformance of the material with the permitted specification has been established, the material has been marked as required by the permitted specification.
Does this mean that the aquired material should be marked by vessel manufacturer as per SA 213/249?