|
Interesting thoughts arise when it comes to the purpose of the radiography. If it's just because of the wall thickness of the nozzle (increased E in UG-27 formula), then it's clear that it has to be radiographed somehow or treated in accordance of CC2235. I don't know how the vessel is made, but I presume that there is some possibility to insert the film inside the nozzle and make an exposition with the source outside.
But if it's specified as radiographed because of the reinforcement of opening in shell, and the area of the radiographed nozzle is the factor- then it's kinf of an issue. Because you can make a shot of the weld from its attachment to shell to its attachment to flange, but not below or beyond these. And it's the point below the attachment to shell that makes the reinforcement business take any benefit of the radiography.
_________________ Konrad Anikiel
|