Quote:
those aspects which are not specifically addressed should not be considered prohibited". I mean, there's no authority to say such a design violates the code, but:
1. your AI will have to make you aware that the design is not consistent
2. your client will probably reject it
3. if you do it deliberately you can be in real trouble if it causes a catastrophe
Otherwise- I hope your heat exchanger will not work anywhere near my house
Akonrad,
Its nothing unusual to provide heat exchanger tubes with zero CA. Please refer to API 661 and TEMA;
Quote:
TEMA R 1.511: All CS parts except as noted below, are to have a CA of 3.2 mm
TEMA RCB 1.517: Tubes, Bolting and Floating head backing devices are not required to have CA
Quote:
API 661 Section 7.1.5: The corrosion allowance shall be as specified by the purchaser for all surfaces exposed to the process fluid, except that no corrosion allowance shall be provided for tubes, gaskets or gasket contact surfaces. If not specified, a minimum corrosion allowance of 3 mm (1/8 in) shall be provided for carbon and low-alloy steel components.
I think this is sufficient to convince client.
Its not a delibrate attempt to ignore effect of CA but just to understand whether ASME permits CS tubes with no CA even if shell and tube sides are requiring CA since TEMA/ API 661 will require CA for all other CS components even if corrosion is not a real concern.
In case corrsion is a concern, material selection for the tubes shall be given due consideration.
Regards