tom @ codeware wrote:
Mauro, I respectfully disagree on only one point, assuming that this is per ASME Code. The MAWP is to be taken based on the material thickness in the corroded condition; ie: MAWP is based on nominal thickness minus the corrosion allowance. This is per the definition of MAWP (maximum allowable working pressure) given in Mandatory Appendix 3, ASME Section VIII Division 1.
Further, the MAWP is determined based on design temperature, vessel in operating orientation, with design liquid level, etc.
To me it is interesting the the Appendix does not define "MAP" (maximum allowable pressure), a term which is in common usage in vessel analysis.
Correct. I should have written (see UG-99(c)) <A hydrostatic test based on calculated pressure> (instead of: at this MAWP). But I understand you already knew what corrosion allowance means. What was the real scope of your question?
Actually engineering use to play with computer calculations and request a number of differently called and established pressure like, whose common meaning is:
- MAWP: to be stamped on the nameplate
- MAP: means the maximum pressure calculated using the actual thickness used to whih the c.a. has been deducted. Sometimes this MAP is requested to be stamped on nameplate and in this case it becomes the MAWP.
- Sometimes the MAP is required to be established but not to be limited by nozzles compensation, so if it were the case, the compensation should be improved to obtain the pressure which can be obtained by the calculation of stresses in shell and head using their actual thickness (deducted c.a.)
- MAP in hot and corroded: same as the above MAP
- MAP in new and cold (that established in UG-99(c)
Actually there should be one MAWP only, which is the pressure required by the purchaser in his request of offer, to be stamped on the nameplate.
Calculation of minimum thickness should be made by the Manufacturer and selection of minimum thickness to be used, according to calculations.
Mauro
Regards. Mauro