All times are UTC + 2 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Oct 22, 2009 12:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 12:08 pm
Posts: 9
Location: India
Its about Section VIII Div 1 2007 - Non Mandatory appendix A,; A-3{j}, the paragraph describes test & retest provision of "fr" for joints types listed in table A-2. It says -

- "The value of 'fr' (test) shall be calculated in accordance with A-4 (a) using the lowest values of L (test). In no case shall the value of 'fr' (test) using a three specimen test exceed the value of 'fr' (test) given in Table A-2. If the value of 'fr' (test) so determined is less than the value of 'fr' (test) given in table A-2, retesting shall be performed in accoordance with (k) below..............."

The highlighted text seems self contradictory, I presume that the latter is true - that the 'fr' calculated as described shall be more than 'fr' given in the Table A-2 in any case.

Would be pleased to get the reassurance.

Regards

Shashank Jain


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 2:20 pm 
Offline
----------------
----------------

Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 6:33 am
Posts: 79
Dear Mr.Shjain

The explanation / interpretation is as follows: Assume various possible cases of value of 'fr' (test) calculated in accordance with A-4 (a):

Case 1: Value calculated based on test is more than or equal tp the value given in Table A-2, then use table value - issue is closed

Case 2: If the value of 'fr' (test) so determined is less than the value of 'fr' (test) given in table A-2, code gives alternates for testing

Please also note that everything is as per non mandatory appendix;

I hope I have clarified;

With regards

_________________
R.SRINIVASAN
Sr. VICE PRESIDENT
Head, Design and Engineering
PED,ISGEC,
YAMUNANAGAR
HARYANA -135001
INDIA


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 14, 2009 7:32 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 12:08 pm
Posts: 9
Location: India
Quote:
The explanation / interpretation is as follows: Assume various possible cases of value of 'fr' (test) calculated in accordance with A-4 (a):

Case 1: Value calculated based on test is more than or equal tp the value given in Table A-2, then use table value - issue is closed
Quote:


I agree to Case 2 mentioned by you, the non mandatory appendix clearly states the retesting provision. At the same time the former statement should rather ask for value of calculated "Fr" to be in any case not less than value of "Fr' in the table but instead it says that "in no case the value of "Fr" thus calculated be more than value mentioned in the table."


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC + 2 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Fernandez and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

phpBB SEO