All times are UTC + 2 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Aug 22, 2010 11:03 am 
Offline
----------------
----------------

Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2009 6:28 pm
Posts: 21
Location: India
Manufacturer PQR Test results of 25 Cr 35 Ni to SA 479 TYP 304H - furnace tubes
Tensile test of the 13 mm thick specimen results in 2.67 % & 3.7 % elongation

Bend test (As per ASME IX) failed at the HAZ. Manufacturer has followed ASTM A 488 “Standard specifications for steel castings, Welding, Qualification of procedures and personnel” to qualify the procedure.

Question
1. Is the PQR qualified if QW-466.19 [General notes (E)] is followed?.

”QW-466.19 - For material with less than 3 % elongation, a macro etch specimen shall be used in lieu of bend test at each bend location. Acceptance criteria shall be in accordance with QW-183(a)”.
2. Can ASTM A 488-8.2.4 be followed to qualify a procedure?

“ASTM A 488-8.2.4 – Where the ductility of the parent metal is such as to render it incapable of meeting the bend test requirements, the bend test shall be conducted in the following manner: A bend bar comprised of parent metal heat treated to the ductility & strength requirements of the applicable specifications shall be bent to failure. The side bend specimen shall be then capable of being bent to within 5° of the angle thus determined.”

_________________
Kareem


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 

All times are UTC + 2 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

phpBB SEO