All times are UTC + 2 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: PWHT - long vessel
PostPosted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 4:50 am 
Offline
----------------
----------------

Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2007 8:22 am
Posts: 55
Location: Philippines
Hi everyone,

Notes on drawing, " Post weld heat treated do not burn or weld",

For a long vessel (cladded) with PWHT , one piece fabrication is not possible due to access at site. If the vendor will do the furnace PWHT in two pieces at shop . What will be the precautions in welding the last joint at field since both piece are already PWHT. Is there any additional NDT required.

Thanks again,
Gilbert


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PWHT - long vessel
PostPosted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 10:26 am 
Offline
----------------
----------------
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2001 1:00 am
Posts: 657
Gilbert wrote:
Hi everyone,

Notes on drawing, " Post weld heat treated do not burn or weld",

For a long vessel (cladded) with PWHT , one piece fabrication is not possible due to access at site. If the vendor will do the furnace PWHT in two pieces at shop . What will be the precautions in welding the last joint at field since both piece are already PWHT. Is there any additional NDT required.

Thanks again,
Gilbert


Nothing special, closing seam shall be welded the same way as the other seams, NDE as well. Local PWHT can be done per UW-40 (a)(3) and UCS-56. The double PWHT cycle should be taken into account in PQR for the adjacent longitudinal welds, if the vessel is subject to impact testing (simulated PWHT time at least 80 percent of the total aggregted time). The User should be advised for the possible decay in corrosion resisting capacity of the clad material, presume it is austenitic s.steel. Mauro


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 14, 2008 4:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 08, 2008 2:37 pm
Posts: 6
Location: UAE
Yes Gilbert,

You can go with Mr Gonzaga. According to Mr Gonzaga below sentence is more important .

The double PWHT cycle should be taken into account in PQR for the adjacent longitudinal welds, if the vessel is subject to impact testing (simulated PWHT time at least 80 percent of the total aggregted time).


inthu :-)

_________________
BE DARE
A positive a itude


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC + 2 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

phpBB SEO