All times are UTC + 2 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Apr 28, 2011 9:31 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2011 9:01 am
Posts: 1
Am working on a vessel which falls under lethal service (client’s requirement). As per the technical requirement, the vessel should be stress relieved after welding because of lethal service.

The MoC of the vessel is SA 240 TP 316L, Normally SS Vessel will not be PWHT.

Is there is any stipulation to overrule the PWHT requirement


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 29, 2011 4:21 pm 
Offline
----------------
----------------

Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 1:55 pm
Posts: 270
Location: DESCON Engineering Limited, Pakistan
Part UHA is applicable to your vessel. I assume the complete vessel is fabricated from UHA materials only. Since the vessel is in lethal service, so UW-2 does not mandate PWHT for UHA vessels. UW-2 mandates PWHT only for Carbon and Low Alloy Steel vessels.
According to Table UHA-32, PWHT for P-No-8 (as your case is), PWHT neither required not prohibited. You can exempt PWHT only in the case if PWHT is also exemt by UW-2 and UHA-51. UW-2 not requires PWHT for UHA materials due to lethal service. Now, all depends upon UHA-51.
What is calculated MDMT is your case?

_________________
Thanks & Regards,
Nasir
Welding Engineer
DESCON Engineering Limited.
Lahore, Pakistan.
Mobile # 0092-336-4145402


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 29, 2011 6:32 pm 
Offline
----------------
----------------

Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 6:31 pm
Posts: 207
Location: Chicago, Illinois USA
ramse24 wrote:
Am working on a vessel which falls under lethal service (client’s requirement). As per the technical requirement, the vessel should be stress relieved after welding because of lethal service.

The MoC of the vessel is SA 240 TP 316L, Normally SS Vessel will not be PWHT.

Is there is any stipulation to overrule the PWHT requirement


ramse 24

Your vessel is exempt from PWHT. See Table UHA-32 Note 1.

leem817


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 01, 2011 10:45 am 
Offline
----------------
----------------

Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 1:55 pm
Posts: 270
Location: DESCON Engineering Limited, Pakistan
Dear Leem,

Third sentence of paragraph UHA-32(a) reads out " Exmpetations for provided in the notes to Table UHA-32 are not permitted when PWHT is a Service requirement as set forth is UW-2 and UHA-51 ..................."
UW-2 does not require PWHT so UHA-51 needs to be checked.

_________________
Thanks & Regards,
Nasir
Welding Engineer
DESCON Engineering Limited.
Lahore, Pakistan.
Mobile # 0092-336-4145402


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 01, 2011 12:00 pm 
Offline
----------------
----------------
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2001 1:00 am
Posts: 657
Javed Nasir wrote:
Dear Leem,

Third sentence of paragraph UHA-32(a) reads out " Exmpetations for provided in the notes to Table UHA-32 are not permitted when PWHT is a Service requirement as set forth is UW-2 and UHA-51 ..................."
UW-2 does not require PWHT so UHA-51 needs to be checked.


No PWHT required for PNo 8 (Type 316)
Mauro


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC + 2 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

phpBB SEO