All times are UTC + 2 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Sanitary fittings
PostPosted: Mon May 22, 2006 1:27 pm 
Offline
----------------
----------------
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 11:11 am
Posts: 480
Location: England
Hello,

Sanitary connections (like these:
http://www.stpats.com/sanitaryfittings.htm) can be calculated per Appendix 24. The ferrules, when welded to a shell or a pipeline, act as nozzles. It's a sort of a hubbed flange, so provisions of Appendix 2 apply (at least partially). 2-2(d)(1) permits to machine them from a forged bar, which is the most feasible way. But UG-14(b) prohibits to do so. The question is, whether 2-2(d)(1) can be understood as an exemption from UG-14(b)?



Thanks,

Konrad


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sanitary fittings
PostPosted: Mon May 22, 2006 2:14 pm 
Offline
----------------
----------------
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2004 1:00 am
Posts: 225
Location: Bochum, Germany
Hello Konrad,
your first statement
akonrad wrote:
Sanitary connections (like these: http://www.stpats.com/sanitaryfittings.htm) can be calculated per Appendix 24.

cannot be applied without restrictions. Please note that TriClamp connections are normally not in the scope of App. 24. However, a lot of designers use App. 24 although breaking several rules, e.g.
Code:
g2 = height of hub shoulder (g2 shall not be larger than T)

Best regards
Michael


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 22, 2006 2:23 pm 
Offline
----------------
----------------
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 11:11 am
Posts: 480
Location: England
Michael,
Yes, but there's more than Triclamp available. And some of them comply with SecVIII-1. Only thing is they don't have right material grade marked on them, so I need to make one from scratch. What do you think about the forged bar issue?

Konrad


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Code Case
PostPosted: Mon May 22, 2006 2:35 pm 
Offline
----------------
----------------
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2004 1:00 am
Posts: 225
Location: Bochum, Germany
Konrad,
there is a Code Case, if I remember well CC 2148, which describes the use of bar material for nozzle necks. Maybe this is the loophole you are searching for. :wink:
Michael


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 22, 2006 2:53 pm 
Offline
----------------
----------------
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 11:11 am
Posts: 480
Location: England
Wasn't CC 2148 cancelled? I thought so, when they put UG-14(b) to the Code.
Konrad


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 22, 2006 3:04 pm 
Offline
----------------
----------------
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 11:11 am
Posts: 480
Location: England
Hmm... Supplement 7 (and the earlier ones) did not annul 2148. Somebody forgot auout it? Supplement 8 still is not published. For today it looks like 2148 is still valid and it doesn't feel like they're gonna put it down. Damnit, I hate the CodeCase annulation russian roulette!

CC2148 does not prohibit from making hubbed flange-like nozzles, so it's a good workaround. Thank you.

Konrad


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 22, 2006 3:06 pm 
Offline
----------------
----------------
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2004 1:00 am
Posts: 225
Location: Bochum, Germany
I can still find it in the Code Case database:
http://cstools.asme.org/CodeCases.cfm
Michael


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 23, 2006 10:09 am 
Offline
----------------
----------------
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2001 1:00 am
Posts: 826
Location: Essen, Germany
Gentlemen,

As I read the title of Appendix 2, BOLTED FLANGE, this does not apply to the clamps, does it.

Why would you want to call the Clamp a FLANGE?

However, the easiest trick to use the clamps is UG-11 Manufacturer's standard parts, which seems to be the case in this context.

Another workaround would be U-1, scope. If the clamp is butt-welded to the nozzle of the vessel, just define the clamp as "piping", and you are out of trouble.

If you do not call the clamp a flange, you can order it SA-182, which allows the use of bar as a raw material up to NPS 4.

Take care.
Dirk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 23, 2006 1:04 pm 
Offline
----------------
----------------
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 11:11 am
Posts: 480
Location: England
Appendix 2 is about bolted flanges, right. I just needed to understand the intent of putting UG-14(b) into the code, when CC2148 is still valid :-)

The problem is not about the clamp (it's not a part of the vessel). The problem is about the hub. Appendix24 says that the material shall comly with UG-5 thru UG-14 (does this allow using a Code Case?)

UG-11 would be applicable to a hub, when it'd be wholly cast or forged. It's not any good to turned couplings from a bar stock. And they should bear some pressure-temp rating (?!)

U-1(e)(1)(a) is indeed nice. A nozzle end not belonging to a vessel, pretty unusual approach :-)

And UG-14(b) limitation applies to flanges only. Right, it's not a flange!

Thanks

Konrad


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 24, 2006 10:54 am 
Offline
----------------
----------------
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 11:11 am
Posts: 480
Location: England
Dirk,

Quote:
As I read the title of Appendix 2, BOLTED FLANGE, this does not apply to the clamps, does it.


Right, but when calculating the hub per Appendix24, Table 2-7.1 is needed anyway.

Konrad


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 

All times are UTC + 2 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group

phpBB SEO