|
Dear Sir,
I have to do local load analysis for a 10” NB nozzle (Radial), which located on a cylindrical shell. So, I preferred to do WRC 297 instead of WRC 107. Now for given loads my nozzle is unsafe in WRC 297 (Stresses at the edge of the pad becomes much high), while the same is safe in WRC 107. So, to be safe in WRC 297, i need to reduce the loads upto 30% of given loadings. I m confused which bulletin to follow (107 or 297)?
Dimensions are as follows,
Input Echo, WRC297 Item 5, Description: 10" NB
Diameter Basis for Cylindrical Shell Vbasis ID Corrosion Allowance for Shell = 3.0000 mm Shell Diameter = 4000.000 mm Shell Thickness = 15.0000 mm Shell Stress Concentration Factor = 1.000
Diameter Basis for Nozzle = ID Corrosion Allowance for Nozzle = 3.0000 mm Nozzle Diameter = 242.926 mm Nozzle Thickness = 15.0622 mm Nozzle Stress Concentration Factor = 1.000
Diameter of Reinforcing Pad = 496.000 mm Thickness of Reinforcing Pad = 15.0000 mm
External Forces and Moments in WRC 107 Convention: Design Internal Pressure 3.85 kgf/cm² Radial Load P -32220.00 N Circumferential Shear Vc 32220.00 N Longitudinal Shear Vl 32220.00 N Torsional Moment Mt 15120.00 N-m Circumferential Moment Mc 15120.00 N-m Longitudinal Moment Ml 15120.00 N-m
Vessel material is SA 516 70 & Nozzle material is SA 106 B & design temperature is 200 degree celcius.
Please, can anyone clarify me?
_________________ Makrand Pandurang Sakpal, Static Equipment Design, makrands9@gmail.com, Ph no:- 9967949656.
|